Evaluation Summary   [ Advanced Component-based Software Engineering, cd5490 ]

Number of evaluations:   18

1
As whole the course was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    1:
    *
        [ 1 ]
    2:
    *
        [ 1 ]
    3:
    * *
        [ 2 ]
    4:
    * * * * * * * * *
        [ 9 ]
    5:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]

    Average:   3.89
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 5 ] Very good course close to research
  • [ 5 ] thank you
  • [ 4 ] intresting subject with an different approach to teaching which was better for me for learning... really fun to try programming some components...
  • [ 4 ] Interesting subject. I liked the seminar form.
  • [ 4 ] Is good to have an article writing course. Felt little short on time.
  • [ 2 ] dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL
  • [ 1 ]
  • [ 3 ] x1CyQS
  • [ 3 ] T0lqxb
2
The course has fulfilled my expectations (not at all=1, more than fulfilled=5)
    1:
    *
        [ 1 ]
    3:
    * * * * * *
        [ 6 ]
    4:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]
    5:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    *
        [ 1 ]

    Average:   3.76
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 3 ] Maybe I would have liked some more basic CBSE stuff, but since I didn't take the basic CBSE course, I guess I shouldn't complain...
  • [ 5 ] i don't even know about the CBSE at all before ,
    but it was much more what i have expected CBSE itself and the lecture
  • [ 4 ] Very good with the guest lecturers
  • [ 5 ] Impressive collection of lecturers
  • [ 3 ] The course was a bit more theoretical than I accepted.
  • [ 4 ] Maybe a larger smorgasboard with "good" articles to select from when reading.
  • [ 1 ] dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL
  • [ 6 ]
  • [ 3 ] x1CyQS
  • [ 3 ] T0lqxb
3
The concept of the course with lectures and the projects was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    3:
    * *
        [ 2 ]
    4:
    * * * * * * * *
        [ 8 ]
    5:
    * * * * * * *
        [ 7 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    *
        [ 1 ]

    Average:   4.29
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 4 ] Nice to be able to write a submittable full paper in a (for me) rather unexplored area...
  • [ 4 ] Maybe bit more iteration of feedback
  • [ 5 ] Good to have a possibility to write a technical report
  • [ 5 ] with this class, i could have the chance to read the papers and write a paper in english , it was precious to me for preparing under-graduate course
  • [ 5 ] Big freedom to focus on desired parts
  • [ 5 ] see question nr 1
  • [ 4 ] You could choose to concentrate on the subject you are most interested in, which is good.
  • [ 4 ] Like.
  • [ 6 ] dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL
  • [ 4 ]
  • [ 3 ] x1CyQS
  • [ 3 ] T0lqxb
4
The course administration (web page, support, information, etc.) was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    3:
    * * * * * *
        [ 6 ]
    4:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]
    5:
    * * * * * *
        [ 6 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    *
        [ 1 ]

    Average:   4.00
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 4 ] No problemo!
  • [ 3 ] Much of the information was sent by email... It would be better to have all important news on the webpage.
  • [ 4 ] especially with the last year's CBSE conference material(pdf files) was helpful
  • [ 5 ] excellent homepage for the course...
  • [ 4 ] OK. No problems.
  • [ 3 ] dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL
  • [ 5 ]
  • [ 3 ] x1CyQS
  • [ 3 ] T0lqxb
5
I have learned (nothing =1, a lot=5)
    3:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]
    4:
    * * * * * * * *
        [ 8 ]
    5:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    *
        [ 1 ]

    Average:   4.06
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 3 ] I've learned most in the field of my (our) own paper...
  • [ 4 ] Good overview of CBSE, its strengths and limits
  • [ 5 ] maybe not so much in the knowledge itself , but
    the way of research and the presentation experience ,through the seminar of other person.,
  • [ 4 ]
  • [ 4 ] Yep, I learned something:).
  • [ 6 ] dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL
  • [ 4 ]
  • [ 3 ] x1CyQS
  • [ 3 ] T0lqxb
6
The lectures were (1=very bad, 5=excellent)
    3:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]
    4:
    * * * * * * * * *
        [ 9 ]
    5:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]

    Average:   3.94
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 4 ] Guest lecturers, seminars and basic lectures. Nice mix!
  • [ 3 ] Bit too much leaning on definitions right away instead of getting the intuition first.
  • [ 4 ] actually i could not understand all of the subject, mostly because my english is not so much good , but i can get a much from them .
  • [ 4 ] OK.
  • [ 4 ] dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL
  • [ 4 ]
  • [ 3 ] x1CyQS
  • [ 3 ] T0lqxb
7
The guest lecture Kurt Wallanu was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    3:
    * * * * * * * *
        [ 8 ]
    4:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]
    5:
    * * *
        [ 3 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    * *
        [ 2 ]

    Average:   3.69
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 4 ] Really nice lecture.
  • [ 4 ] Good speaker
  • [ 4 ] Sometime difficult to understand
  • [ 3 ] Missed that lecture..
  • [ 3 ] i can get a much from the pdf related with him
    but because my english is not good and his speech was so fast to me . so i could not
  • [ 3 ] Interesting lecture but alot of information to take in.
  • [ 4 ] OK.
  • [ 6 ] dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL
  • [ 6 ]
  • [ 3 ] x1CyQS
  • [ 3 ] T0lqxb
8
The guest lecture Michel Chaudron was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    1:
    *
        [ 1 ]
    3:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]
    4:
    * * * * * * * *
        [ 8 ]
    5:
    * * *
        [ 3 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    * *
        [ 2 ]

    Average:   3.75
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 6 ] Missed that lesson
  • [ 3 ] Ok, I guess...
  • [ 5 ] Very mature research of CBSE, could motivate decisions they made all they way to real application and still scientific contrib.
  • [ 4 ] Very good introduction
  • [ 4 ] all of topics that he said was very helpful and i could understand most of them
  • [ 5 ] Interesting research project presented in a simple and pedagogical way
  • [ 4 ] OK.
  • [ 3 ] dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL
  • [ 1 ]
  • [ 3 ] x1CyQS
  • [ 3 ] T0lqxb
9
The guest lecture Paola Inverardi was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    2:
    * *
        [ 2 ]
    3:
    * * * * * * *
        [ 7 ]
    4:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]
    5:
    * * *
        [ 3 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    *
        [ 1 ]

    Average:   3.53
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 2 ] ..a bit too formal...
  • [ 4 ] Interesting research presentation
  • [ 3 ] actually i could not get a much from her
  • [ 6 ] Did not attend.
  • [ 3 ] dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL
  • [ 2 ]
  • [ 3 ] x1CyQS
  • [ 3 ] T0lqxb
10
The assigments were (1=very bad, 5=excellent)
    3:
    * * *
        [ 3 ]
    4:
    * * * * * *
        [ 6 ]
    5:
    * * * * * * * *
        [ 8 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    *
        [ 1 ]

    Average:   4.29
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 5 ] I really like the idea of writing a paper together with someone you normally do not write a paper with...
  • [ 4 ] Very good to have own viewpoint, since can be used in the future research as well
  • [ 5 ] i could get a much thing from it .
  • [ 4 ] OK. Felt little short on time.
  • [ 6 ] dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL
  • [ 4 ]
  • [ 3 ] x1CyQS
  • [ 3 ] T0lqxb
11
The most I like in this course was
  • The assignments...
  • M Chaudrons Lecture
  • A possibility to choose the topics
  • the experience of english seminars and writing a english papers
  • The overview and the guest lecturers
  • the assignement programming the component in CCL
  • Writing. Allowing more time for literature study would be great.
  • dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL







  • x1CyQS
  • T0lqxb
12
What can be improved in the course?
  • I have no concrete suggestions...
  • Build bit more intuition b4 diving into definitions, then they are also easier to grasp and object to ;-)
  • PACC projects could be prepared better
  • it would be great if one of the geust lecture would be from the industry and have an experience of implement or management in CBSE approach.

  • Something that keep all the students in the course, the assignments is not so hard when you do them, but they sound very demanding in descriptions and during presentations. Make clear that the goal with each assigniment and project is up to the student etc.
  • nothing what i can see...
  • Direcives for PACC project were a bit unclear.
  • Larger selection of "good/recommended" articles to complement course book. Maybe seminars where each group presents contents of an article which is then discussed.
  • dupusnft http://rkybmgvf.com vmttsjin jnpututl [URL







  • x1CyQS
  • T0lqxb



Copyright © Damir Isovic