Evaluation Summary   [ Advanced Component-based Software Engineering, cd5490 ]

Number of evaluations:   13

1
As whole the course was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    1:
    *
        [ 1 ]
    3:
    * *
        [ 2 ]
    4:
    * * * * * * *
        [ 7 ]
    5:
    * * *
        [ 3 ]

    Average:   3.85
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 4 ] Yes i have learnt how to do research and make a report and do presentation
  • [ 4 ] Interesting course that put software development as a whole in a higher perspective
  • [ 4 ] Interesting lectures, combined with interesting assignments.
  • [ 1 ] hnbyhbhp http://ghnacdcf.com xyzahghv tztkwgxd
  • [ 3 ] PMBo3r
  • [ 3 ] flDeGL
2
The course has fulfilled my expectations (not at all=1, more than fulfilled=5)
    2:
    *
        [ 1 ]
    3:
    * * *
        [ 3 ]
    4:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]
    5:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]

    Average:   4.00
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 3 ] yes ofcouce we learnet which is reqirement of the corce
  • [ 5 ] I feel that the course gave me good introductory knowledge about software components and related concepts, according to my expectations
  • [ 2 ] hnbyhbhp http://ghnacdcf.com xyzahghv tztkwgxd
  • [ 3 ] PMBo3r
  • [ 3 ] flDeGL
3
The concept of the course with lectures and the projects was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    3:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]
    4:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]
    5:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    *
        [ 1 ]

    Average:   4.00
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 3 ] ok
  • [ 5 ] Perhaps every thing took slightly too much time. I think I used the time equals to 7 points instead of 5.
  • [ 4 ] Good, except for all the technical problems with the remote lectures.
  • [ 3 ] No comments, besides that one had to take quite a lot initiative to get started, but on the other hand - that's how things work in real life.
  • [ 6 ] hnbyhbhp http://ghnacdcf.com xyzahghv tztkwgxd
  • [ 3 ] PMBo3r
  • [ 3 ] flDeGL
4
The course administration (web page, support, information, etc.) was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    2:
    *
        [ 1 ]
    3:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]
    4:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]
    5:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]

    Average:   3.85
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 5 ] very good . each and every thing is prperly conveyed and managed
  • [ 4 ] The only problem was a mix up of dates on the webpage and slides, otherwise, very good administration.
  • [ 4 ] Good, except certian inconsistancy as to days and dates and lecture rooms that didn't match always. I think that it was a copy-paste error from last year's course...
  • [ 2 ] hnbyhbhp http://ghnacdcf.com xyzahghv tztkwgxd
  • [ 3 ] PMBo3r
  • [ 3 ] flDeGL
5
I have learned (nothing =1, a lot=5)
    3:
    * * *
        [ 3 ]
    4:
    * * *
        [ 3 ]
    5:
    * * * * * *
        [ 6 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    *
        [ 1 ]

    Average:   4.25
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 4 ] i have learnt a lot from this corce
  • [ 5 ] As said previously, I've learnt a lot on this course that I feel will come in handy whan moving on to more in-depth subjects along my Ph.D career ;)
  • [ 6 ] hnbyhbhp http://ghnacdcf.com xyzahghv tztkwgxd
  • [ 3 ] PMBo3r
  • [ 3 ] flDeGL
6
The lectures were (1=very bad, 5=excellent)
    3:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]
    4:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]
    5:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]

    Average:   4.00
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 3 ] i was late in this corce so i have not attend the lecturers but lecturer material is exelect providing basic knowledge for the cource
  • [ 4 ] Nothin to complain about
  • [ 5 ] hnbyhbhp http://ghnacdcf.com xyzahghv tztkwgxd
  • [ 3 ] PMBo3r
  • [ 3 ] flDeGL
7
The guest lecture Wolfgang Weck was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    2:
    *
        [ 1 ]
    3:
    * * * * * * *
        [ 7 ]
    4:
    * *
        [ 2 ]
    5:
    * *
        [ 2 ]
    don't know / vet inte:
    *
        [ 1 ]

    Average:   3.42
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 3 ] ok
  • [ 3 ] His lecture was a bit outside of my problem domain so that I could not get much from.
  • [ 3 ] Interesting, but a bit too application specific for my needs.
  • [ 3 ] Interesting, but a bit to "stressed" which made him jump into / (and over) things a bit to fast, leaving some holes in his presentations...
  • [ 2 ] Low grade because of a too simple demonstration of eclipse.
  • [ 6 ] hnbyhbhp http://ghnacdcf.com xyzahghv tztkwgxd
  • [ 3 ] PMBo3r
  • [ 3 ] flDeGL
8
The guest lecture Mikael Åketholm was (very bad=1, excellent=5)
    1:
    *
        [ 1 ]
    3:
    * * * * * * * * *
        [ 9 ]
    4:
    * *
        [ 2 ]
    5:
    *
        [ 1 ]

    Average:   3.15
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 3 ] ok
  • [ 3 ] I thought that the SaveCCM project was interesting as a whole and I got a good insight in the research areas and software structure that they designed.
  • [ 1 ] hnbyhbhp http://ghnacdcf.com xyzahghv tztkwgxd
  • [ 3 ] PMBo3r
  • [ 3 ] flDeGL
9
The assigments were (1=very bad, 5=excellent)
    3:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]
    4:
    * * * * * *
        [ 6 ]
    5:
    * *
        [ 2 ]

    Average:   3.77
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 4 ] good
  • [ 4 ] Like I sad above: I took a little bit too much time, I think.
  • [ 4 ] A bit overwhelming in terms of time-consumption, but on the other hand one has to draw his own limits as to how much one can acomplish. Good assignments in general that contributed to the "big picture" of CBSE
  • [ 3 ] The assignments was well designed and gave us the choice of writing reports and implementing projects that was interesting to oneself.
  • [ 3 ] hnbyhbhp http://ghnacdcf.com xyzahghv tztkwgxd
  • [ 3 ] PMBo3r
  • [ 3 ] flDeGL
10
The most I like in this course was
    1:
    *
        [ 1 ]
    3:
    * * * *
        [ 4 ]
    4:
    * * *
        [ 3 ]
    5:
    * * * * *
        [ 5 ]

    Average:   3.85
    * * * * * * *
    0               3           5
  • [ 4 ] to make a research based report and present it
  • [ 5 ] It was a nice course with nice topics.
  • [ 5 ] The project
  • [ 4 ] Being able to get more knowledge about CBSE and having the opportunity to choose own projects that suits ones needs.
  • [ 4 ] Hard to say, this was my first PhD course and I didn't really have any expectations and no comparisions to draw. However, I feel that Ivica has given lots of feedback on all questions asked throughout the course, along with a good understanding of the CBSE concept that we could discuss during the lessons.
  • [ 3 ] The mix of sparse lectures combined with homework.
  • [ 3 ] Guest lecture of Wolfgang Weck, discussion with other participants.
  • [ 1 ] hnbyhbhp http://ghnacdcf.com xyzahghv tztkwgxd
  • [ 3 ] PMBo3r
  • [ 3 ] flDeGL



Copyright © Damir Isovic