Evaluation Form   [Software Engineering / Game Development - project course, cdt310, ht08, Rikard Land]


*Evaluation summary

1
What do you think about the information on the course?
Comments on webpage.
Comment:

2
How do you judge the administration of the course?
Comments on schedule etc.
Comment:

3
How do you judge the course in total?
Comments on the content, disposition, relevance etc.
Comment:

4
How do you judge the course content relative to level/credits?
Comments, e.g., more of X, less of Y, certain previous knowledge I was lacking:
Comment:

5
Do you think you had enough previous knowledge on the whole?
Comment:

6
How do you judge your work effort relative to the number of credits?
Comment:
7
How much did you attend lectures ?
8
How much did you attend laboratory work ?
9
How much did you attend exercises?

10
We had different forms of education during the course.
Judge how valuable the lectures have been for your learning.
Comment:

11
Judge how valuable the laboratory work have been for your learning.
Comment:

12
Judge how valuable the exercises have been for your learning.
Comment:

13
Judge how valuable the projects have been for your learning.
Comment:
14
Which forms of education were good ?

15
Which forms of education were less good ?


16
How do you judge the course literature in total?
Comment:

17
How do you judge the laboratory work instructions?
Comments, e.g., if some laboratory task has been especially good/bad
Comment:

18
How did the laboration supervision work?
Comments, e.g. reasonable feedback, timeliness of correction (compared to the quality of your lab submission)
Comment:

19
How was the forms of supervision of the projects (i.e. steering group meetings, feedback, other teacher involvement, email contact with teachers, ...)?
Comments, e.g., if some has been extra good/bad
Comment:

20
How were the document templates for the projects?
Comments, e.g., if some has been extra good/bad
Comment:

21
How did the laboratory equipment work?
Comment:
22
What was good with the course?

23
What was less good with the course?

24
How do you think the course could be enhanced?

25
Miscellaneous comments and advice to the teacher.

26
How can the course be improved in order to increase the quality of environmental aspects (e.g., choice of double instead of single side copying)?





Copyright © Damir Isovic